Stats
  • Total Posts: 12576
  • Total Topics: 4980
  • Online Today: 78
  • Online Ever: 816
  • (September 28, 2024, 09:49:53 PM)

Redundancy Department of Redundancy / DOGE

  • 8 Replies
  • 1394 Views
*

Offline droidrage

  • *****
  • 5242
  • 7
  • I Am Imortem Joe
    • Underground Music Companion
Redundancy Department of Redundancy / DOGE
« on: November 13, 2024, 04:14:15 AM »
Bureau Of Redundancy Department #Plotagonized (by Rudy Mustang)




Redundancy Department of Redundancy

« Last Edit: December 05, 2024, 11:24:07 AM by Administrator »

*

Offline droidrage

  • *****
  • 5242
  • 7
  • I Am Imortem Joe
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: Redundancy Department of Redundancy
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2024, 04:22:13 AM »
Office of Redundancy Office




Department of Redundancy Dept.




Naruto- Department of Redundancy




Redundancy





Department of Redundancy Department

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment


Don't Get Sent to the Department of Redundancy

https://www.livewritethrive.com/2015/03/25/dont-get-sent-to-the-department-of-redundancy/
« Last Edit: November 13, 2024, 05:10:09 AM by droidrage »

*

Offline Administrator

  • *****
  • 5151
  • 4
  • Carpe Diem
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: Redundancy Department of Redundancy
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2024, 06:50:43 AM »
David Brent is Made Redundant




David's Redundancy Package | The Office




The Redundancy Package




Redundancy!




Vino Blanco - Redundancy || Comedy Song Music Video (I Lost My Job Comedy Song)




MADtv - Workplace Redundancy

« Last Edit: November 15, 2024, 07:08:18 AM by Administrator »

*

Offline Administrator

  • *****
  • 5151
  • 4
  • Carpe Diem
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: Redundancy Department of Redundancy
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2024, 06:57:54 AM »
Redundancy consultation meeting - questions for redundancy interview




Three tips to help you through redundancy | BBC Ideas




What to Do When Made Redundant




What to do if you get made redundant




Redundancy Consultation Meeting




How to negotiate redundancy




Redundancy Consultation Processes


*

Offline Administrator

  • *****
  • 5151
  • 4
  • Carpe Diem
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: Redundancy Department of Redundancy
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2024, 03:56:35 AM »
OH GAWD, MUSK AND TRUMP HAVE JUST CREATED THE DEPARTMENT OF REDUNDANCY FOR REAL = ROFL

CALLED DOGE = DEPARTMENT OF GOVERMENT EFFICIENCY



What happens if Elon Musk treats the government like he did Twitter?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/12/04/elon-musk-twitter-doge-andrew-cuomo-mayor-smartphones-required/

Why would you hand the reins of government efficiency to a guy who recently tanked a social media company he bought, in part by getting rid of 80 percent of staff? “Asking Musk to do for the federal government what he has done to Twitter is a recipe for disaster,” writes Adam Lashinsky.

Let Adam enumerate the ways. “Through careless cost-cutting, Musk has managed to wipe out much of the value of Twitter, causing massive losses for his financial backers and himself. His antics have caused the company’s revenue to decline. And he has taken an overwhelmingly useful platform for discussion of everything from politics to entertainment and turned it into a megaphone for his recently embraced right-wing ideas.”

Of course, even if Musk’s stewardship of Twitter has been bad for most users, employees and investors, it arguably bought him a role advising an administration likely to favor him on taxes, regulations and culture-war issues. If his DOGE work follows that model, as Adam suggests, it might be a disaster for us — but by Musk’s stars, it could be another glorious win.


Why DOGE might be the Department of Good-for-Elon Efficiency

Musk’s record at Twitter suggests ‘efficiency’ is not his best use

There has been little focus on the havoc Musk wreaked at Twitter.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/12/03/elon-musk-twitter-doge-trump-x/




Elon Musk has an enviable record as an innovator and a canny entrepreneur. Just consider the accomplishments of SpaceX and Tesla.

His record at cutting down to size the one large organization where he wielded his fiscal machete, however, tells a different story. Musk bought Twitter, now X, in 2022 and promptly cut 80 percent of its staff. That Twitter survived presumably constitutes the bona fides he brings to his role as co-head of Donald Trump’s vision for the advisory panel dubbed the Department of Government Efficiency, already shorthanded as DOGE.

Yet for all the talk of how difficult it will be for Musk and his DOGE co-director, Vivek Ramaswamy, to wring their promised $2 trillion from the federal budget, there has been little focus on the havoc Musk wreaked at Twitter. If the solid functioning of the critical tasks of the federal government is at all important to the American public, it is worth pausing to consider how ill-prepared Musk and his coterie of libertarian cost-cutters are to accomplish much more than more chaos should they be entrusted with imposing efficiency on the federal bureaucracy.

At Twitter, Musk proved himself to be anything but a genius. Using plenty of other people’s money, he agreed to pay $44 billion for the social media company, then tried backing out of the deal, only to consummate the transaction when a judge told him he’d face trial otherwise. Through careless cost-cutting, Musk has managed to wipe out much of the value of Twitter, causing massive losses for his financial backers and himself. His antics have caused the company’s revenue to decline.

And he has taken an overwhelmingly useful platform for discussion of everything from politics to entertainment and turned it into a megaphone for his recently embraced right-wing ideas.

Asking Musk to do for the federal government what he has done to Twitter is a recipe for disaster.

Musk’s fans, and these include Trump, like the way he shoots from the hip. But this tendency served Musk poorly at the business where his cost-cutting was supposed to save the day. He fired most of Twitter’s executive team and frayed his relations with his company’s primary source of revenue: its advertisers. A year after he bought the company, he unleashed an unprintable expletive at his customers, who were displeased with what Twitter was becoming, further zapping the firm’s sales. All the while, Musk claimed a $56 billion stock-based compensation package for himself from Tesla, the highest in U.S. history for any executive until a Delaware court tossed that element of the deal earlier this week.

In a capitalist system, all this can happen at any company. That’s a risk all investors take. But government is another matter. Musk’s impulse-driven leadership may backfire in a world where “promote the general welfare” is the constitutional order of every day. It may prove unsuited to a leader who decides to pull a Twitter at, say, the Food and Drug Administration or the Federal Aviation Administration.

Because Musk has been so successful in his many endeavors, he has created a narrative around himself that he has skill and experience at successfully cutting large organizations. The same goes for the fellow tech bros he promises to tap for their supposed expertise. According to The Post’s reporting, these include the investor Marc Andreessen, whose techno-optimism is becoming harder to follow, and Travis Kalanick, the Uber co-founder who knows plenty about growing companies but little about making them more efficient. As I learned researching a book about Uber’s rise, Kalanick admired the pragmatism of the Chinese government leadership — right up to the point Beijing nudged Uber out of China.

There also is a side to Musk that makes him a horrible fit for conducting the people’s business. When he didn’t like the size of Twitter’s office-lease payments, he stopped making them. (The landlord made moves to litigate, and suddenly Twitter paid up.) Musk had a similar distaste for the severance packages contractually promised to top executives, even though he bought the company with knowledge of the agreements. Those payments remain subject to litigation.

It’s almost inconceivable to imagine the government of the United States reneging on its contracts. But can we be certain Musk won’t follow the Twitter playbook in his crusade to make Uncle Sam more efficient? Trump also has a long record of stiffing the people he works with. I suppose that is one way to cut costs.


Nor does Musk demonstrate the temperament for something as important as streamlining the federal bureaucracy, itself of a worthy cause. Shortly after taking over Twitter, he instructed workers to cover up the “W” on a sign at its San Francisco headquarters building so it read “Titter.” He erected a giant “X” after removing the Twitter name altogether, in violation of the city’s building code. Like a scolded child, Musk took down the signage when the city pushed back.

Indeed, the very name of his federal efficiency project — DOGE — suggests this is all one big sophomoric joke to Musk. “Doge” also is the name of the cryptocurrency Musk created to amuse himself. The word supposedly comes from the misspelling of “dog.” That he would apply a brand name to a government undertaking is outrageous enough. But it won’t be amusing if Musk meddles with government only to make it worse.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2024, 04:09:58 AM by Administrator »

*

Offline Administrator

  • *****
  • 5151
  • 4
  • Carpe Diem
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: Redundancy Department of Redundancy / DOGE
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2024, 11:35:10 AM »
The day of DOGE on Capitol Hill

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/12/05/day-doge/




Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy will get their first taste of Capitol Hill today, meeting with senators and House members in separate meetings about DOGE, the new organization they will lead to cut government waste.

Lawmakers are eagerly signing up for the hottest new ticket on Capitol Hill with Republican lawmakers jockeying to be involved in the new commission — named the Department of Government Efficiency — because of its proximity to President-elect Donald Trump and his high-profile allies as well as the organization’s goal of implementing long-held Republican orthodoxy of shrinking the size and scope of the federal government. Meetings with Musk and Ramaswamy today are expected to be well attended.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), who convinced Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) to put her in charge of the new House subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency, in exchange for not opposing him for speaker, has been working with Musk and Ramaswamy on a framework for how the group will find up to $2 trillion in spending cuts.

“It’ll be amazing what we can do,” Greene said in an interview, adding that every inch of the federal government is “on the table.” She’s hosting a meeting with Musk and Ramaswamy and a small group of Republican House members this afternoon followed by a larger meeting where all House and Senate members are invited, which is expected to be well attended.

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), is leading the Senate DOGE group. At a recent visit to Mar-a-Lago, she gave Musk, Ramaswamy and Trump a report based off years of research with $2 trillion worth of discretionary spending waste. The DOGE X account has been tweeting out some of the items from her report.

At a meeting with Ramaswamy and potentially Musk this morning with Republican senators, Ernst will present Ramaswamy with a new report focused on waste associated with federal telework policies. Ninety percent of federal workers telework, the report says, compared to three percent before covid, leaving office buildings empty. The report found that between 23 and 68 percent of federal workers, depending on the agency, don’t live in D.C. and are still being paid premium city wages.

Jumping on the DOGE train
DOGE is the latest shiny object that Republican lawmakers are angling to be a part of. “I’ve said I really want to be a part of DOGE. I think I could bring [long pause] a different perspective. I want to be a part of it. So if they let me come, I’ll come,” Sen. Katie Boyd Britt (R-Alabama) said.

At an Aspen Security Forum event in Washington yesterday, Ramaswamy touted how much enthusiasm DOGE has generated.

“I actually think of the things that’s been encouraging about seeing DOGE come into existence is how nonpartisan — and even apolitical — the interest in this mission has been,” Ramaswamy said, adding that he is hearing from “business leaders but [also] people who have never in a million years thought about entering politics.”

Even Democrats are anxious to get involved.

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (Florida) became the first Democrat to join the House DOGE Caucus on Tuesday, and could be in line for a seat on Green’s DOGE panel on the House Oversight Committee.

“I joined the caucus because that’s where the conversations are going to be had. Why not have a seat at the table?” Moskowitz said. “I’m sure [Republicans] are going to have ideas that I’m going to disagree with. That’s okay. But there are ideas that I have about reforming the government, as well. I don’t think there’s a single American in the country [who] thinks government is perfect, so Democrats shouldn’t fear the conversation.”

Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel — a long time Democratic operative who served in the House and who has been floated as DNC chair and potentially an Illinois Senate candidate in 2026 — told the New York Times’ Ezra Klein on his podcast that Democrats should “100 percent” welcome DOGE.

‘School House Rock’
But a big part of the meeting, senators say, is to educate Musk and Ramaswamy — successful entrepreneurs who have never had to deal with the political realities of Congress — about congressional districts and the impact of decisions on individual members’ local economies.

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina), a member of the Senate DOGE working group, said the meeting will also be a little bit “School House Rock.”

They’re going to have to learn “political realities,” Tillis said.

“You’re going to have to fight with that rock-ribbed conservative that says, ‘don’t take those 100 jobs out of my district,’ even though every business logic would say they needed to be somewhere else,” Tillis said.

Some of (the cuts) are going to be easy decisions. Some of them are going to be bold decisions. Some of them are going to be hard decisions,” Greene said.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2024, 11:36:56 AM by Administrator »

*

Offline droidrage

  • *****
  • 5242
  • 7
  • I Am Imortem Joe
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: Redundancy Department of Redundancy / DOGE
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2025, 12:36:14 AM »
How DOGE could succeed — or fail miserably

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/23/usds-doge-musk-pahlka-analysis/




Elon Musk takes the stage at a rally for Donald Trump at Capital One Arena in Washington on Sunday, a day before Trump's inauguration. (Tom Brenner for The Washington Post)


In 2014, his administration still reeling from the colossally bungled rollout of the Obamacare website Healthcare.gov, then-President Barack Obama tapped a team of Silicon Valley techies to drag the executive branch into the digital age. His administration created the United States Digital Service, led by Mikey Dickerson, who had left Google in 2013 to help fix Healthcare.gov, and Jennifer Pahlka, who had founded the nonprofit Code for America.

Eleven years later, President Donald Trump is handing the keys of the USDS to Elon Musk, rebranding it as the U.S. DOGE Service, and making it the receptacle for the billionaire’s plan for a “Department of Government Efficiency” that would radically streamline federal operations.

As our colleagues Faiz Siddiqui, Elizabeth Dwoskin and Jeff Stein reported this week, the move follows months of tension between Musk and fellow entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, culminating in Ramaswamy’s exit from the DOGE project to run for governor of Ohio. Now Musk, they wrote, “will be able to deploy a team of handpicked software engineers to every government agency, where under Trump’s executive order they will be granted ‘full and prompt access to all unclassified agency records, software systems, and IT systems.’”

Musk, who has relished the limelight as a top Trump adviser, will be taking charge of a unit that won admiration within the government while keeping a low public profile.

“USDS has been one of the bright spots when it comes to government innovation over the last decade,” said Don Moynihan, professor at the University of Michigan’s Ford School of Public Policy. He cited its work in helping to create the IRS’s Direct File program and the State Department’s online passport renewal system. “If you have a complicated digital problem, they’re the people you call, and they consistently help to produce good results,” he said.

Pahlka said she and her team faced a steep learning curve when they set out to revamp government systems in 2014. But over time they learned how to work with different agencies to streamline their processes.

“It’s not just that they get something like online passport renewal working, and working in ways that people find easy to use,” she said. “But it’s that they bring these different approaches to the agency, and then the agency, in the best-case scenario, adopts them.”

Musk’s outsize profile and close relationship with Trump could turbocharge the agency’s work, experts say — if he and his deputies are willing to learn and adapt.

“The best-case outcome is that you get a sort of USDS on steroids,” Moynihan said. “You get an influx of new talent from Silicon Valley, but you also get the political visibility and momentum that Musk can bring, and you go and fix some problems with how government digital services operate.”

For that to happen, Musk and his team will need to “work with the rest of the government, rather than against it,” said Bridget Dooling, a law professor at Ohio State University who specializes in administrative law and regulatory policy. “There are lots of people in government who want things to work better, and this new USDS will help itself by not positioning itself as opposed to the entirety of how government works and the people in it.”

Asked what might be different about the USDS under Musk, Pahlka said simply, “He has more power.” That could be a good thing, she said, if the goal is to accelerate the transformation of government systems — including by cutting unnecessary red tape. But it depends on how he wields it.

All three experts said they could also envision the project going off the rails.

“I’ve said very publicly there does need to be a rebalancing between what I call ‘stop energy’ and ‘go energy,’” Pahlka said. You have a lot of compliance and guardrails that make it hard to get stuff done in government. But that doesn’t mean I think we should, like, fire half the workforce.”

If Musk were to “take a slash-and-burn approach and use USDS to do that,” she went on, “it would ruin USDS’s ability to partner with agencies and help them deliver better for the American public.”

Moynihan agreed, saying, “The negative side of DOGE is that it’s really an exercise in making government smaller rather than improving capacity.” That goal is not quite the same as the one taken up by the idealistic techies in the USDS who left or passed up higher-paying Silicon Valley jobs because they were “motivated to make public services work better.”

Asked for a realistic-worst case scenario, Dooling said, “They spin their wheels, waste a bunch of money and other peoples’ time reinventing policies that have already been tried, start fights in public and private about things where their knowledge is limited, and work at cross-purposes to other, more knowledgeable parts of the executive branch.”

The best chance of success might be for someone other than Musk to run the USDS day-to-day.

Some of Musk’s companies, such as SpaceX, are overseen by competent executives who stay out of the limelight. Pahlka said that could make sense in the case of USDS, allowing Musk to “stay a step removed” while “someone else who’s in his orbit” and shares his way of thinking heads up the unit.

“My greatest hope is that he and his colleagues learn, they learn quickly, but they bring this sort of audacity and connect it up with the folks that have already done a lot of that learning, and they shake things up in a really good way,” she added. “My basic sense is that in order to help people change, you need to build trust. I actually think the DOGE team will learn that.”

The question is whether they’ll learn it the easy way or the hard way.

*

Offline Administrator

  • *****
  • 5151
  • 4
  • Carpe Diem
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: Redundancy Department of Redundancy / DOGE
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2025, 09:41:21 PM »
Musk's Department of Government Efficiency kicks into action under Trump's watch




Democrat overseeing DOGE shares what she believes Musk is planning to do




DOGE targets the penny in latest cost-cutting initiatives




Profoundly Dangerous": Public Citizen Sues Trump over Legality of Elon Musk-Led DOGE




The REAL Waste That Elon's DOGE Should Cut

« Last Edit: February 06, 2025, 02:29:32 AM by Administrator »

*

Offline droidrage

  • *****
  • 5242
  • 7
  • I Am Imortem Joe
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: Redundancy Department of Redundancy / DOGE
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2025, 05:51:27 PM »
Records show how DOGE planned Trump’s DEI purge — and who gets fired next


A DOGE team plans to fire federal workers who are not in DEI roles and employees in offices that protect equal rights, internal documents show.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/02/15/doge-fire-federal-employees-trump-dei/





A team of workers from the U.S. DOGE Service developed step-by-step plans for carrying out President Donald Trump’s order to purge diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives from the federal government — and over the next six months intends to expand that campaign dramatically, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post. DOGE aims to target staffers who are not in DEI roles and employees who work in offices established by law to ensure equal rights, internal DOGE documents show.

In the coming weeks, the documents show, DOGE has planned for the Trump administration to trim staff from dozens of offices across the executive branch, including those that protect employees’ civil rights and others that investigate complaints of employment discrimination in the federal workplace. Among the groups targeted are a Veterans Affairs office that works to ensure all veterans receive equal access to care and an office within Health and Human Services that provides information about the health of minority populations.

The DOGE team is also looking to place on leave, and ultimately fire, scores of government employees who do not work in DEI roles but who perform functions that DOGE determined were related to DEI, the documents show. It is unclear precisely how DOGE intends to decide whether employees’ jobs are tied to DEI. Such a strategy will push, if not violate, the law and could draw legal challenge, team members wrote in the documents.

See inside DOGE’s playbook for eliminating DEI
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2025/doge-playbook-dei-trump/?itid=cb_box_X5HHZCQEYJDWBC7D3BMZOFZZV4_1

The internal documents reveal the scope, speed and ambition of DOGE’s work. Over the past three weeks, DOGE has torn through one federal agency after another, gaining access to sensitive data and winning control of the flow of federal cash. In a blitz that has shaken parts of Washington, DOGE team members have identified swaths of jobs and programs to eliminate that do not match Trump’s ideological views.

Trump campaigned against DEI, calling it divisive and destructive, and has in recent days celebrated its demise under his administration. DEI “would have ruined our country, and now it’s dead,” the president said last month.

But even before Trump took office, a DOGE team that included Elon Musk’s top aides — who have links to his companies but little to no government or political experience — was planning actions far beyond DOGE’s original remit of reducing the government’s size and spending.

In the weeks leading up to the inauguration, DOGE positioned and envisioned itself as the executor and enforcer of Trump’s executive order against diversity.

OGE staffers developed a three-part plan for Trump’s anti-DEI campaign, internal documents show. “Phase 1” marked the first day of Trump’s presidency, when Trump signed an executive order stating that all DEI offices, positions and programs within the executive branch must be terminated within 60 days. The DOGE plan laid out how, on Inauguration Day, all federal agencies should begin placing DEI workers on paid leave and shutting down DEI websites and social media accounts. Those changes transpired almost exactly as DOGE laid out.

The nation is now in DOGE’s “Phase 2,” which is scheduled to last until Wednesday, according to the documents. In this stage, DOGE planned for the Trump administration to place on leave some employees working at statutorily required offices. The administration is also supposed to cancel “DEI-focused” federal contracts and grants. And the administration is meant to identify workers across the government who hold non-DEI jobs but who can be tied to diversity initiatives through unspecified other means, according to the DOGE planning documents.

“There are DEI-focused personnel embedded throughout divisions that do not have any identifying DEI criteria in their name,” one document states. “Phase 2/3 will be focused on identifying these employees and putting them on administrative leave.”

At least some of Phase 2 appears to be underway, particularly at the Education Department. The department last month placed on leave nearly 100 employees in non-DEI roles after DOGE staffers unearthed personnel records showing most took a diversity training during the first Trump administration, The Post reported. As of this week, DOGE representatives at the department have directed the agency to cancel 29 “DEI training” grants at the department totaling $101 million, according to a post on X from DOGE.

It is unclear whether any federal workers assigned to DEI roles in offices required by law have been placed on leave.

DOGE’s “Phase 3” starts later this month, on the 31st day of the administration, and lasts until the 180th day, which is in mid-July, according to the documents. That stage moves from placing workers on paid leave to calling for large-scale firings, the documents show. Ultimately, DOGE intends for the Trump administration to terminate all DEI-linked employees via a Reduction In Force (RIF) action — the federal form of layoffs — including some who work for legally mandated offices.

Goals for Phase 3 are listed in brief bullet points in the DOGE document.

“RIF the Phase 1 offices in their entirety,” one bullet point reads, referring to offices dedicated to DEI. That process is already underway: The Office of Personnel Management last month directed agencies to submit written plans for firing all DEI office workers and encouraged agencies to begin issuing termination notices immediately.

A second bullet point states: “RIF the Phase 2 offices’ corrupted branches,” referring to what DOGE has determined are DEI elements of offices required by law. The bullet point concludes: “We are exploring options for this.”

One such option emerged this week. On Tuesday, Trump signed an executive order paving the way for federal agencies to reshape or terminate offices legally mandated to exist.

Asked a series of questions about DOGE’s planning efforts, the Trump administration said the team had the president’s full backing.

“The White House’s position is that we are ridding the federal government of DEI, full stop,” a White House spokesman said Friday. “DOGE is there as a collaborator ensuring that we get rid of waste, fraud and abuse. And if DEI is waste, fraud and abuse, it’s gone.”

Members of DOGE, including those involved in the planning, did not respond to questions or multiple requests for comment.

Under what authority’

DOGE has maintained a veil of secrecy, refusing to disclose the names of staff, what positions they hold or how much they are being paid. But The Post has reported that more than 30 people work closely for or with DOGE, about half of whom have ties to Musk or his companies.

In the first days of 2025, a subgroup of the DOGE team began sketching out how to implement a government-wide elimination of DEI employees and programs, internal DOGE documents show.

In early January, DOGE staffers started filling out spreadsheets tracking various diversity-related elements of the government, including DEI offices, contracts and spending, records and documents obtained by The Post show.

The records show a handful of DOGE team members active in workshopping the plan: Stephanie Holmes, a former Jones Day lawyer who now runs human resources at DOGE; Anthony Armstrong, a banker who advised Musk on his acquisition of Twitter; Brian Bjelde, a 20-year SpaceX employee; and Noah Peters, an attorney who once worked at the Federal Labor Relations Authority. Holmes was the creator of many of the documents and spreadsheets, according to metadata reviewed by The Post.

Armstrong, Bjelde and Peters have been heavily involved in DOGE’s work reshaping the Office of Personnel Management, The Post and other outlets have reported. Another frequent contributor to the planning was Adam Ramada, a DOGE team member whom Business Insider has identified as a Miami venture capital investor with a stake in a SpaceX supplier. Ramada has recently been active in efforts to slash spending and staff at the Education Department, according to records obtained by The Post.

Holmes, Armstrong, Bjelde, Peters and Ramada could not be reached or did not respond to requests for comment.

The DOGE team identified 131 agencies within the federal government, then assigned one of at least 30 reviewers to examine all the agency’s sub-offices and employees. DOGE staffers searched each agency’s structure and personnel for the terms “diversity,” “equity,” “inclusion,” “DEI” and “justice.” Reviews were often completed within a day or two, records show.

The group also compiled two lists, titled “DEI Grants to Eliminate” and “DEI 10 Contracts to Eliminate,” detailing roughly $380 million in spending from NASA, the Labor Department, the Defense Department and Health and Human Services. Most of the contracts were for DEI training, professional development services or workplace climate surveys. Grants marked for cancellation included a $22.2 million “Nursing Workforce Diversity” program at the Health Resources and Services Administration, meant to encourage nursing careers for racial and ethnic minorities, and a $8.35 million “Fair Housing” initiative to promote racial desegregation, including by ending neighbor harassment based on race.

And, citing an article from the conservative media outlet Daily Wire as their inspiration, DOGE team members analyzed more than 800 federal job postings with DEI responsibilities on usajobs.com to determine that 50 had been filled in 2024, the documents show.

“The employee names are not [available],” one DOGE spreadsheet reads, “but included below is as much information available about each of the jobs, so we can find the hired employees in Phase 2.”

The documents also detail scripts for what Office of Personnel Management staff should say in calls to interim agency heads explaining the president’s anti-DEI executive order, as well as what those interim agency heads should say in calls to employees tasked with carrying out that order. The first set of calls were supposed to last 15 minutes each; the second were supposed to last 20 minutes, the scripts show. The guides for agency heads included the instructions: “It is important that we implement these changes swiftly, but always with care and respect for our employees.”

The DOGE documents further include suggested versions of the email agencies could send to inform employees in DEI roles that they were being placed on administrative leave.

The emails sent to such employees in January matched a DOGE draft email nearly word for word, a Post examination found.

A FAQ that DOGE created for agency heads showed that the team members did not always feel confident in the powers they were assuming.

In one version of the draft FAQ, the second question — posed from the perspective of an agency head — asks, “Under what authority are you directing us to do this?”

Beneath the question is one word highlighted in yellow: “EO,” referring to Trump’s executive order. Next to the acronym, in a set of brackets, there is a single character apparently questioning whether such an order would be sufficient: “[?]”

Corrupted branches’

Over the course of about three weeks, the DOGE team outlined a plan to radically reshape the government — including proposing shutting down offices required by law — but it also occasionally toned down its ambitions, according to the records obtained by The Post.

A DOGE document dated Jan. 9 identifies 225 DEI-related offices and councils across the federal government. Forty-two of these should be shuttered immediately under Trump’s day-one executive order, the document states. The rest — including civil rights and employment discrimination offices mandated by law — should be terminated later.

“The remaining offices require closer analysis for potential statutory protection and will also be eliminated, wherever possible, Day 2-30,” the document states.

But a later document, dated Jan. 13, walked that back. Under the revised plan, the DOGE team reduced the number of targeted DEI offices to 76. DOGE also shifted the plan: The aim would be to cut staff from offices required by law, rather than eliminate those offices outright.

The Jan. 13 document listed 38 “statutorily mandated offices (EEO / Civil Rights)” that “have been corrupted with new DEI divisions.” The new plan, the document shows, was to “identify the non-statutory branches / DEI employees and place them on administrative leave.”

By Jan. 17, DOGE had reduced its goals still further, naming 33 offices protected by law that should be trimmed down to eliminate DEI elements. The list includes offices of equal employment opportunity at agencies including the Agriculture Department, the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It also includes 100-plus staff from the Energy Department’s Office of Energy Justice and Equity.

As of last month, the total number of employees DOGE planned to cut in its DEI purge was at least 583, according to a spreadsheet — but is likely far more, since the DOGE staffers stopped filling out employee tallies for targeted offices a third of the way through the document.

The ultimate goal is to fire all employees identified as doing DEI-related work, the documents make clear.

DOGE staffers worked through several iterations of how they could do so without running afoul of the law, the records show.

One January planning document lays out DOGE’s vision for how to terminate employees in direct DEI roles. It includes a table analyzing the pros and cons of three possible options for “handling the employees who work out of each DEI office.” One option was to fire DEI staffers immediately — but that brought the “highest risk of challenge and potential injunction,” the document noted. Another option was to reassign DEI staff to a new office; but that would delay their goal of overall staff reductions, according to the document.

A third option, labeled “DOGE ... Recommended,” suggested placing DEI employees on 10-day paid administrative leaves, then firing them. According to the document, this approach was best because it was “difficult to challenge”; “reasonable legal authority exists to extend beyond 10 days”; and it allows “time for legal preparation to anticipated challenges.”

This appears to be the option agencies across the federal government are following.

“Phase 3” of the Trump administration’s DEI purge is slated to begin Wednesday, according to the documents. That period lasts until July 19, or the 180th day of the presidency. Throughout this period, DOGE has large ambitions to cull staff, the documents show, but — as of mid-January — team members were not yet sure how to accomplish the firings.

The “Phase 3” period is supposed to include “three workflows,” per a DOGE planning document. First, the Trump administration will identify and place on leave “additional DEI-related employees” who do not work in a DEI office but are “dispersed through normal operating divisions.” Second, the administration will lay off DEI offices “in their entirety.” Third, the administration will lay off the “corrupted branches” of statutorily required offices that work on civil rights and employment discrimination: “We are exploring options for this,” the document reads.

A set of bullet points headlined “Next Steps Underway” shows that DOGE staffers were actively looking for legal arguments to justify the planned firings.

A spreadsheet from Jan. 17 suggests a path.

There, under the heading “Broad Ideas,” is a proposal for presidential action: Trump could issue an executive order “to re-focus [Equal Employment Opportunity] offices on their statutory mandate, removing DEI from them.”

The executive order Trump signed this week may serve that goal.

The order calls on federal agency heads to develop “reorganization plans.” Within 30 days, agency heads are supposed to produce a report identifying the laws that created their agency, as well as every agency office that is required by law.

The order concludes: “The report shall discuss whether the agency or any of its subcomponents should be eliminated or consolidated.”
« Last Edit: February 15, 2025, 05:53:40 PM by droidrage »