Stats
  • Total Posts: 8793
  • Total Topics: 2336
  • Online Today: 657
  • Online Ever: 657
  • (Today at 06:15:46 PM)

✈✈ THE DANGER ZONE ✈✈

  • 6 Replies
  • 459 Views
*

Offline droidrage

  • *****
  • 3489
  • 7
  • I Am Imortem Joe
    • View Profile
    • Underground Music Companion
✈✈ THE DANGER ZONE ✈✈
« on: May 13, 2021, 01:55:49 AM »
F/A-18 Carrier Landing - Cockpit View







TOP GUN -DANGER ZONE (Music Video)




Spectacular Glider Touchdown in Rain





https://www.facebook.com/PilotCube/

Microsoft Flight Simulator live streaming every day! A real pilot and instructor. Flying is our passion. We want to invite you to this world.

REAL PILOT FLYING MSFS AIRBUS A320 MOST DANGEROUS AIRPORTS
Real pilot with 22 years of flight experience and 3.900 hrs of flight. Aircraft that I have flown are: PA-34, Aero Comammander, Emb-110, Citation Sovereign, Citation Excel, Falcon 7X.
Today I am a flight instructor for the Falcon 7X aircraft.

« Last Edit: May 25, 2021, 10:59:52 PM by Administrator »

*

Madsen

Re: THE DANGER ZONE
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2021, 04:04:40 PM »

*

Offline droidrage

  • *****
  • 3489
  • 7
  • I Am Imortem Joe
    • View Profile
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: THE DANGER ZONE
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2021, 07:03:48 PM »


LOL @ Archer - love when he says that in the series.


Archer - Highway To The Dangerzone


*

Offline droidrage

  • *****
  • 3489
  • 7
  • I Am Imortem Joe
    • View Profile
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: THE DANGER ZONE
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2021, 10:56:46 PM »
Pilot Cube

✈✈F/A-18 Super Hornet In Action, Missile Launches and more✈✈

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=231209115524679&id=102165838429008
https://www.facebook.com/watch/102165838429008/

FA-18 Super Hornet Action - Carrier Break, Missile Launches & Chase (4k)











« Last Edit: May 25, 2022, 12:44:39 AM by Administrator »

*

Offline Administrator

  • *****
  • 3368
  • 4
  • Carpe Diem
    • View Profile
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: ✈✈ THE DANGER ZONE ✈✈
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2022, 12:39:05 AM »
Top Gun: Maverick | NEW Official Trailer (2022 Movie) - Tom Cruise




‘Top Gun: Maverick’ rocks, with finesse, style and genuine emotion

https://www.washingtonpost.com/movies/2022/05/24/top-gun-maverick-movie-review/



Tom Cruise returns as Navy flyboy Pete ‘Maverick’ Mitchell in a sequel that feels familiar and new in just the right proportions


From the first dulcet tones of its synthesized score to the Univers Ultra Condensed font used in its opening credits, “Top Gun: Maverick” announces in no uncertain terms that it feels the need … the need to wring every nostalgic smile, cheer and teardrop it can from fans of the 1986 original.


Top Gun (1986) Official Trailer - Tom Cruise Movie




Replaying the prologue of its predecessor nearly beat for beat — that adrenaline-pumping music taking us into the danger zone; those sleek, vaguely phallic fighter jets taking off and landing on a huge aircraft carrier, while cool-looking guys gesticulate in cool-looking semaphore; all of it drenched in a romantic, magic-hour glow — “Top Gun: Maverick” knows exactly what it’s doing and how to execute the plan. Like the hyper-competent aces at the story’s core, this is a movie that defines its lane early and sticks to it, with finesse, unfussy style and more than a few sneak attacks of emotion.

That “Top Gun: Maverick” works so well can surely be attributed to Tom Cruise, who created the title character, rule-floutin', death-cheatin’, heart-breakin’ pilot Pete Mitchell (call sign: Maverick). In the first movie, Pete was working out some daddy issues while he learned to shoot down Soviet MiGs; 30 years later, he’s still a captain in the U.S. Navy, working as a test pilot and, in a beautifully staged prelude of things to come, zooming into the stratosphere to stave off obsolescence at the hands of remote-flying drones.

Soon enough, Pete is called back to the Top Gun aviator school in San Diego, where he’s tasked with teaching a new class of elite pilots to fly a tactically impossible mission. He’s brought his daddy issues with him, this time in the form of lingering guilt over the death of his best friend Goose (played by Anthony Edwards in “Top Gun”), and the fact that one of his students is Goose’s bitter son Bradley (Miles Teller).

Bradley’s call sign is Rooster, which we learn in a raucous barroom scene introducing the brand-new batch of swaggering stick jockeys; they have call signs like Coyote, Fanboy and Omaha, but they might as well be Callback, Easter Egg and Reference in a movie brimming with all three. In less skilled hands, such constant nods to the past would feel pandering and lazy. But Cruise has enlisted his own crack team to turn an otherwise ho-hum retread into a handsome, occasionally funny and smartly self-aware exercise in escapism that in many ways outperforms the classic it’s sequelizing.

For one thing, Pete himself has become a far more interesting protagonist, losing the cocky air of petulance and impunity and mellowing into a man with some miles on him. He’s still being dressed down by superiors (played with note-perfect gruffness by Ed Harris and Jon Hamm), and they still can’t resist his charms, ending nearly every argument by gazing at him with adoration. (“He’s the fastest man alive,” one of them murmurs.) “Top Gun: Maverick” hews to the structure of the first movie, punctuating scenes of rivalry, seduction and personal reckonings with increasingly difficult flight tests and simulated dogfights, the whole thing culminating in a genuinely spectacular, climactic real-time battle.

Let’s be honest: The 1986 film, directed by Tony Scott from a script by Jim Cash and Jack Epps Jr., was corny to the point of camp. (That slo-mo volleyball game, played by bronzed and shirtless flyboys, still reigns supreme as the most hilariously homoerotic scene of 20th-century cinema.) In the hands of director Joseph Kosinski, working with a screenplay by Ehren Kruger, Eric Warren Singer and Christopher McQuarrie (from a story by Peter Craig and Justin Marks), the testosterone and fetishistic posturing have been toned down, sacrificing nothing by way of shamelessly indulgent entertainment value.

So: The volleyball scene is now a football game — shirtless in some cases, but also including a female pilot (call sign Phoenix, played by Monica Barbaro), and one in which Cruise’s character holds his own with the buff newbies before gracefully retiring to the sidelines. Kosinski has enlisted a terrific ensemble to play the young pilots, who are constantly one-upping and chicken-fighting each other: Teller simmers convincingly with unresolved rage at Pete; within the otherwise anonymous collection of supporting players, Jay Ellis, Glen Powell and Lewis Pullman are particularly effective as Payback, Hangman and Bob.

That last call sign is just one example of the low-key humor that runs through “Top Gun: Maverick,” which gratifyingly never resorts to snark or smug winking. Although Jennifer Connelly delivers an impressively relaxed, appealing performance as Penny, the bar owner Pete reconnects with after an apparently messy breakup several years ago, audiences know that the real love story in a “Top Gun” movie is between the pilots and their wingmen. In the film’s most affecting sequence, Pete goes to see his old frenemy Iceman (Val Kilmer), who may be physically diminished but is no less distinguished; it’s a get-out-your-mankerchiefs moment played with taste, restraint and sincerity that’s as disarming as it is quietly authentic.

At the center of all the turning and burning, banking and nosediving and bro’ing down sits Cruise — wearier, warier, but still in complete control like few other stars who have crossed into the 21st century. As a performer, he’s both commanding and generous, knowing exactly when to step back, when to throw in a self-deprecating joke and when to become Tom Freaking Cruise, in all his smiling, instinctively charismatic glory. As a producer, he has wisely taken the nearly 40 years in between “Top Guns” to steward the property with care and intelligence, resulting in a movie that feels familiar and new in just the right proportions. Among its many virtues, most amazingly, “Top Gun: Maverick” doesn’t feel like a video game or a three-dimensional comic book or an ad for a theme park. It splashes extravagantly across the screen in its own battle against obsolescence, as if to say: This is what movies looked like, once. And this is what they can look like again.

PG-13. At area theaters. Contains sequences of intense action and some strong language. 131 minutes.

*

Offline droidrage

  • *****
  • 3489
  • 7
  • I Am Imortem Joe
    • View Profile
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: ✈✈ THE DANGER ZONE ✈✈
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2022, 12:42:32 AM »
Fighter pilots will don AR helmets to train with imaginary enemies

U.S. Air Force pilots will use augmented reality helmets to train against the most advanced Chinese and Russian fighter jets

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/08/04/virtual-reality-fighter-pilot-helmet/



In the near future, “Top Gun” may get a reboot.

Roughly one year from now, fighter pilots will begin flying with helmets outfitted with visors that can augment reality and place digital replicas of enemy fighter jets in their field of vision. For the first time, pilots will get to fly in the air and practice maneuvering against imitations of highly advanced aircraft made by countries like China and Russia.

It’s also part of the U.S. military’s investment of billions into virtual reality, artificial intelligence and algorithms to modernize the way it fights wars.

The pilot training solution, created by military technology start-up Red6, will be rolled out to the Air Force first as part of the company’s $70 million contract with the branch. Company and former military officials say the technology will be a safe, cheap and realistic way to ensure America’s pilots are prepared to battle the best fighter planes in the world.

“Better, faster, cheaper,” said Daniel Robinson, founder and chief executive of Red6. “This is the way we’ll train [pilots] in the future.”

For decades, the way America trains its fighter pilots has changed little. Aviators from the Air Force and Navy often start their training flying on a Northrop T-38 jet, often using a similar syllabus to one that’s been around since the 1960s. From there, they train on planes — such as F-22 or F-35 fighter jets — that they’ll fly during their career.

A crucial component to training is imitating battle. To do so, the military provides its pilots a combination of flight simulators and actual flying to sharpen their skills. The Navy’s Strike Fighter Tactics Instructor program, widely known as “Top Gun,” inspired a blockbuster movie franchise that introduced millions to pilot training techniques.

But the military faces significant issues in training fighter pilots. Using simulators cannot replicate the feel of being in the air and maneuvering against an opponent, said Red6 board chairman and retired Air Force Gen. Mike Holmes, though they are budget friendly. On the other hand, putting pilots in the air to train is costly — ranging anywhere from $15,000 to $100,000 per flying hour depending on the aircraft — and dangerous. Pilot accidents have been on the rise, reports indicate, with 72 in fiscal 2020.

Moreover, when pilots go up in the air to sharpen their combat techniques, the military typically contracts opponents for the fight. These companies that pretend to be aggressors often rely on aircraft that aren’t as sophisticated as fifth-generation fighter jets used by Chinese and Russian militaries.

Holmes said this is worrisome. For two decades, pilots have trained to fight against targets in the Middle East. But now, China and Russia are higher priorities, and the United States is less prepared to battle against their more capable, and highly advanced, fighter jet squadrons.

“To keep relevant,” he said, “we’re going to have to push up our training game over the next several years.”


A still from the movie "Top Gun," which takes a fictional look at how the Navy trains fighter pilots. (Paramount/Kobal/Shutterstock)

Robinson, a former fighter pilot with the United Kingdom’s Royal Air Force, said the idea for Red6 and its augmented reality training program occurred in 2017. That’s when he met his company co-founder, Glenn Snyder, who had created a virtual reality system to help train racecar drivers by simulating various racetracks.

Robinson said he reached out to the U.S. Air Force, which acknowledged it was looking for better, cheaper ways to train pilots. From there, Robinson and his team set about adapting the car racing virtual reality technology to flight simulation.

The helmets resemble normal ones, but the visors display fighting scenarios that pilots can react to in the air — all while seeing the world around them. They use proprietary data from a private-sector military intelligence company, Janes, and U.S. government intelligence agencies, to ensure their digital models are close to real life simulations.

Allowing pilots to train against accurate simulations in the air, rather than other human pilots would be safer for pilots, Robinson said.

In August of 2021, Red6 was awarded a $70 million, five-year contract with the Air Force to deploy the technology. Going forward, it could also be used by other branches including the Navy, company officials said.

Charlie Plumb, a retired naval aviator who flew at “Top Gun” and is on Red6’s advisory board, said simulating dogfighting scenarios with advanced enemy aircraft in the air is imperative to keeping pilots safe in real-life combat situations.

Plumb, who flew an F-4 fighter jet and was shot down in Vietnam, tortured and held captive for over six years, said better training would have helped him. In the Vietnam War, much of the plane fighting happened at low-level altitudes, which required pilots to have better mastery of turning sharply left and right while getting into position to fire a missile at the enemy.

“I didn’t know how to do that,” he said. Plumb does not have a financial stake in the company.

Mark Cancian, a retired Marine Corps colonel, said an augmented reality training tool that allows pilots to train in the air against simulated enemy aircraft is budget conscious and sensible.

“It’s certainly promising,” said Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

He added that the technology will still require testing for safety.

Sorin Adam Matei, a professor at Purdue University who studies the intersection of technology and military operations, was more skeptical of the value of the technology. When it comes to augmented reality, he said, it’s more important to make augmented reality solutions for infantry soldiers than for pilots.

“With pilots, augmented reality ... it is and is not that big of a deal,” he said. “We would like our pilots to make decisions before … they need to look down and see that there’s a plane below them.”

*

Offline Administrator

  • *****
  • 3368
  • 4
  • Carpe Diem
    • View Profile
    • Underground Music Companion
Re: ✈✈ THE DANGER ZONE ✈✈
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2023, 11:44:37 PM »
Top Gun with a Cat